Calgary News Calgary News
EN

Air Canada is launching a pilot program to expedite the handling of passenger complaints

Air Canada is launching a pilot program to expedite the handling of passenger complaints
Air Canada is launching a pilot program to expedite the handling of passenger complaints

Air Canada has announced the launch of a pilot project designed to expedite the processing of passenger complaints filed under Canada’s Air Passenger Protection Rules. This is not intended to fully replace the Canadian Transportation Agency’s (CTA) current system, but rather to provide an additional voluntary option for some customers who already have cases pending with the CTA.

According to Air Canada’s official statement, the airline has invited 500 randomly selected passengers to voluntarily refer their cases to an independent third party—Canada Aviation Dispute Resolution (CADR). The company notes that this format is intended to provide a faster, impartial, and reasoned outcome, as well as help reduce wait times for cases currently being processed through the government mechanism.

As part of the pilot program, passengers do not need to re-upload documents or resubmit information. If a customer agrees to participate, their case materials from the CTA can be automatically transferred to CADR electronically. After that, the CADR arbitrator reviews the passenger’s documents and Air Canada’s response, and the passenger has the opportunity to respond to the airline’s position. Decisions must be made within 90 days of receiving complete information from both parties.

An important detail is that the arbitrator’s decisions will be binding on Air Canada but non-binding on the passenger. If the customer is not satisfied with the outcome, they may reject the decision and continue through the standard CTA system. Participation in the pilot program is free and, according to the airline, does not deprive the passenger of their place in the queue for the agency to review their case.

Air Canada also reported that it consulted with Transport Canada and the Canadian Transportation Agency regarding the design of this project prior to launching the pilot. The review itself has been entrusted to CADR, an independent organization specializing in the resolution of disputes in the field of air transport. Air Canada notes that CADR is a subsidiary of The CDRL Group, a non-profit organization certified to provide ADR services in the United Kingdom and several European countries.

The CTA’s official website partially explains why this initiative has emerged at this particular time. The agency explicitly notes that, due to the high volume of complaints, it can currently take over 24 months before a complaint is accepted for processing and receives a so-called Start Notice. Once this notice is issued, the official review process must be completed within 90 days.

Under the current CTA procedure, once a case is initiated, the airline has up to 14 calendar days to submit a response, and the passenger has up to 4 days to reply. The case is then reviewed for compliance with the criteria, may proceed to mediation, and then to a final decision. The CTA notes that the final decision within this process is confidential and binding and must be issued within 90 days of the Start Notice.

This is why Air Canada’s new pilot program appears to be an attempt to offer some passengers a faster out-of-court route while the government system continues to operate under heavy load.

At the same time, the project remains limited in scope for now: it applies only to 500 invited customers, is voluntary, and does not signify a general shift of all Air Canada disputes to alternative arbitration.

For passengers, this means the emergence of a potentially faster option for resolving disputes without losing the right to return to the standard CTA procedure. For Air Canada, this is a test of whether an independent out-of-court mechanism can reduce the number of protracted disputes and shorten the time it takes to resolve claims. If the pilot program proves successful, it could serve as an argument in favor of broader use of similar models in the Canadian aviation sector.